The Goa government’s recent move to deploy drone surveillance to monitor illegal fishing activities, particularly the use of LED light fishing, signals a promising step forward in addressing long-standing concerns of environmental degradation and the marginalization of traditional fishing communities. However, while the pilot project marks progress, the broader question remains: is the government genuinely committed to curbing these destructive practices, or is this just another cosmetic gesture?
LED fishing, along with bull trawling, has been a contentious issue in Goa’s coastal waters for years. These methods are not only ecologically destructive but also deeply inequitable.
LED fishing involves using powerful lights to attract fish at night, disrupting the natural behaviour of marine species and indiscriminately drawing in juvenile fish, crustaceans, and even protected species. Such practices deplete fish stocks rapidly and destabilize the delicate marine ecosystem that sustains thousands of traditional fishermen.
The environmental consequences are severe. Studies and anecdotal evidence from local communities have shown declining fish populations and increasing difficulty for small-scale fishers to make ends meet.
The indiscriminate catch sizes and species, many of which are undersized or not mature enough to breed, hinder the natural replenishment of fish populations. This directly threatens marine biodiversity and poses long-term risks to food security.
Moreover, the socio-economic dimension cannot be ignored. Traditional fishing communities, who rely on sustainable, small-scale methods passed down through generations, find themselves at a severe disadvantage. They are witnessing not just a decline in catch but also the erosion of a cultural identity built around harmonious coexistence with the ocean. Their demands have been consistent and reasonable: enforce the existing ban on LED fishing, penalize offenders effectively, and provide equitable access to marine resources.
To its credit, the Goa Fisheries Department’s drone surveillance initiative is a recognition of these concerns. Drones, with their ability to monitor large swathes of coastline in real-time, can be effective in detecting violations that often go unnoticed by conventional patrol methods.
If implemented well, this technology could serve as a deterrent to illegal operators and make enforcement more transparent and accountable.
Yet, technology alone is not a silver bullet. The success of this initiative will depend heavily on what follows. Surveillance must be backed by swift legal action, significant penalties, and sustained political will.
There is a growing scepticism within fishing communities who feel that despite repeated assurances, enforcement remains weak and violators continue to operate with impunity—often due to political or commercial influence.
Furthermore, public awareness campaigns, stakeholder consultations, and regular updates on enforcement outcomes are essential.
The government must go beyond surveillance and demonstrate its seriousness by involving traditional fishing cooperatives in policymaking and empowering them to play a role in monitoring activities.
If the Goa government is truly committed to sustainable fisheries and the well-being of its coastal communities, it must approach this issue holistically. That means integrating technology with strong governance, community participation, and unflinching commitment to ecological justice.
The current initiative is a good start—but it must be the beginning of a broader strategy, not the end of the conversation. Goa’s marine ecosystem is at a tipping point. The government now has an opportunity to show that it is not just playing to the gallery, but genuinely willing to lead the way in sustainable coastal governance. The stakes—for the environment, the economy, and the cultural fabric of Goa—could not be higher.
Sorry, there was a YouTube error.
