New Delhi: India’s military leadership has revealed a striking example of ethical decision making during cross border operations, as Army Chief Upendra Dwivedi explained why strikes on terror hubs were deliberately paused during prayer hours. Speaking at a forum in Bengaluru, he outlined how humanitarian considerations were integrated into operational planning.
During Operation Sindoor, Indian forces had the capability to strike targets at any time. However, commanders chose to closely monitor activity patterns across the border and avoided launching attacks when individuals at these locations were offering Namaz. This decision, guided by the belief that “Sabka Malik Ek Hai,” reflected an effort to ensure that military action remained focused strictly on terror infrastructure without appearing to target religious practices.
The operation itself was launched in May 2025 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, which resulted in the loss of 26 lives. It marked a significant moment in India’s military approach, showcasing seamless coordination between the Army, Navy and Air Force. Advanced capabilities were deployed across multiple domains, combining conventional force with cyber and electronic warfare to disrupt enemy systems and dismantle key launchpads in Pakistan occupied territories.
A notable aspect of the campaign was the growing role of information warfare. Military planners allocated a portion of their efforts to counter misinformation and digital propaganda, which intensified following the strikes. This included addressing hybrid threats such as drone incursions and attempts to provoke unrest through online channels. In response, the armed forces have since strengthened their focus on psychological and information defence strategies.
The escalation lasted several days before both sides agreed to halt hostilities across land, air and sea. The developments highlighted not only India’s operational strength but also its emphasis on maintaining ethical standards, demonstrating that even in high intensity conflict, restraint and respect for broader values remain central to its military doctrine.
