The recent announcement by Sarbananda Sonowal, the Union Minister of Ports, Shipping & Waterways, regarding the development of Goa as a major cargo and cruise destination has sparked a range of reactions among residents and environmental advocates.
The initiative, crafted under the Sagarmala Scheme, is touted to enhance Goa’s position in the maritime industry with the establishment of a new international and domestic cruise terminal, alongside a ferry terminal at Mormugao Port.
With a budget of ₹101.72 crores and a completion target set for March 2025, the project aims to not only bolster the local economy by generating job opportunities in transportation and tourism but also to improve inland connectivity and promote coastal shipping.
However, the discourse surrounding this development has inevitably turned toward the contentious issue of coal transportation.
Recently, the state has seen a surge in activism against plans to significantly increase coal imports through Mormugao Port, a matter that has escalated from local concern to national attention. Citizens, organized under the banner “Goa Against Coal,” have vocally opposed these proposed expansions, fearing severe environmental consequences that could undermine Goa’s natural beauty and public health.
The government has been quick to refute claims that the double-tracking project is specifically aimed at facilitating more coal transport. Officials assert that the project is geared towards improving overall connectivity, giving priority to enhancing domestic tourism. However, the opposition remains steadfast, urging a more comprehensive approach to environmental safeguarding while developing economic infrastructure.
Prominent environmental activists have voiced concerns that the influx of coal would continue to exacerbate pollution issues in Vasco, a coastal town already grappling with deteriorating air quality. “Coal pollution is plaguing Vasco for almost two decades. There does not seem to be any improvement or hope that it would be resolved,” he points out.
The experience of those residing in Vasco and neighbouring constituencies like Mormugao and Dabolim illustrates a community fed up with the constant nuisance of coal dust permeating their lives.
As the government pushes forward with its ambitious plans, it raises questions about the balance between economic growth and environmental integrity.
Goans are understandably passionate about protecting their homeland, which thrives on tourism, a sector deeply intertwined with the preservation of its natural resources. The discussions around the cruise terminal and increased cargo operations must, therefore, include a genuine commitment to ecological responsibility.
Moreover, the potential opportunities for local business revenue, job creation, and improved infrastructure cannot come at the expense of the environmental health of the region. A solution that encompasses sustainable practices alongside economic development must be prioritized to ensure that Goa remains not just a bustling cargo and cruise hub, but also a safe and liveable paradise for its residents.
As this narrative unfolds, community voices must be at the forefront—advocating for transparency and demanding accountability to safeguard the land and livelihoods while welcoming the prospects of growth. The hope remains that as Goa charts this new course, it does not steer toward greater coal reliance but rather toward sustainable development that honours its rich ecosystem.
SURAJ BNANDREKAR
Editor, Goemkarponn
