The landscape of Goa is undergoing a notable transformation as the government cracks down on illegal structures in various locales.
In the last two days, the authorities have set their sights on two specific areas: Lala ki Basti in Auchit Vaddo and the shops near Nerul Bridge. This demolition spree has raised several questions regarding the processes and motivations behind such actions, prompting a deeper examination of the situation.
On one hand, the demolition of 25 illegal structures in Lala ki Basti sheds light on the pressing need for urban planning and adherence to building regulations.
The structures in question were fully deemed unauthorized, and erected without any approval or compliance with local laws.
While the decision to demolish is aligned with the need for legal conformity, it raises a set of critical questions: Why were these illegal structures allowed to spring up in the first place? What mechanisms are in place to monitor and prevent such violations?
Beyond Lala ki Basti, the situation escalated near the Nerul Bridge, where 31 shops were demolished following eviction notices issued by the collector in December 2024.
The evictions stemmed from complaints that these establishments posed a significant nuisance to both motorists and pedestrians, resulting in traffic disruptions. When confronted with the demolition, the shop owners expressed their distress, citing the destruction of their livelihoods.
This emotional aspect of the situation emphasizes the need for a balanced approach that considers the socio-economic realities of those affected by such decisions.
As the government takes these measures, it prompts observers to question the role of flying squads tasked with monitoring illegal construction.
Are these units effectively doing their job, or is there a lack of oversight leading to the proliferation of structures that flout regulations?
The part played by politicians in this narrative cannot be overlooked either. Some critics argue that these elected officials may protect illegal constructions to maintain favour with certain constituencies, possibly qualifying them as a vote bank.
This political manoeuvring could explain the delayed responses to illegal building practices that, in some cases, remain unchecked for extended periods.
A key point of discussion lies in the timing of the government’s swift actions against illegal structures. Some speculate that this recent demolition drive could be a strategic move to demonstrate compliance with the high court’s orders, which recently mandated the cessation of illegal construction across Goa.
By showcasing their enforcement measures, the authorities can project an image of commitment to upholding the law, even while questions loom over the effectiveness of long-term monitoring and prevention strategies.
The ongoing demolitions in Lala ki Basti and Nerul serve as critical reminders of the delicate balance between regulation and the need to protect individual livelihoods. As Goa’s urban environment continues to evolve, it’s essential for the government to engage in open dialogues with communities affected by such demolitions, ensuring that policies are not only enforced but also considerate of the human elements intricately tied to them. Addressing these concerns could lead to a more equitable approach to urban development, fostering a landscape where legality and livelihood coexist harmoniously.
