New Delhi: The Centre has issued a detailed clarification defending the proposed development of Great Nicobar Island as a major maritime and economic hub, describing it as a strategic necessity for India’s future rather than an ecological threat.
The response comes after concerns raised by Rahul Gandhi regarding potential environmental damage and the impact on indigenous communities. In its statement, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change emphasised that the project is aimed at strengthening India’s position in the Indo-Pacific region and reducing dependence on foreign transshipment ports.
Officials pointed out the island’s strategic location, situated close to one of the world’s busiest East-West shipping routes, offering significant advantages for global trade. The project includes key infrastructure such as an international container transshipment terminal, a new airport, a hybrid power facility, and a planned township spread across a large area.
The government stressed that the initiative is vital for both economic growth and national security. By establishing a domestic transshipment hub, India seeks to reduce reliance on ports in countries like Singapore and Sri Lanka, where a large portion of Indian cargo is currently handled.
Addressing environmental concerns, authorities stated that the project has undergone a comprehensive impact assessment. They noted that a small percentage of the region’s forest cover will be diverted, with phased tree felling planned. To balance this, large-scale compensatory afforestation and designated green zones have been proposed, alongside oversight by expert committees to ensure ecological compliance.
The government also underscored its commitment to protecting indigenous communities such as the Shompen and Nicobarese tribes, clarifying that no displacement is planned. Measures have been outlined to safeguard their rights, cultural identity, and livelihoods.
Planned in phases up to 2047, the project is being positioned as a model for balancing infrastructure development with environmental preservation, even as it continues to draw debate over ecological and social implications.
