New Delhi: Pakistan occupied Kashmir has witnessed a major security crackdown after authorities reportedly placed around 150 members of the Jammu and Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC) under the Fourth Schedule of the region’s Anti Terrorism Act.
The move marks a significant escalation in actions against the activist group, with several prominent leaders now coming under enhanced monitoring and legal scrutiny. The Fourth Schedule is a provision used to track individuals considered a potential threat to public order and security, placing them under continuous surveillance and restricting various aspects of their activities.
According to official notifications, the action was taken under Section 16(1) of the Anti Terrorism Act, 2014, following recommendations from law enforcement agencies and approval from the region’s highest authorities. Those included on the list are now classified as proscribed persons, resulting in tighter restrictions on their movement, financial transactions and public engagements.
The crackdown has also reportedly extended beyond surveillance measures. Several properties and business establishments linked to JAAC members have allegedly been sealed, while assets connected to some activists have been frozen. The affected properties include commercial outlets, educational institutions, hostels, bakeries and other privately owned enterprises.
Among the individuals reportedly impacted are several well known JAAC leaders and activists who have been involved in public campaigns and political mobilisation across the region. The measures have intensified debate over the government’s approach towards civil activism and dissent.
Authorities maintain that the actions are intended to preserve law and order and prevent any potential unrest in sensitive areas. However, critics argue that the scale of the operation raises concerns about political freedoms and the treatment of groups critical of the administration.
The developments have drawn widespread attention across the region, where tensions between authorities and activist organisations have surfaced periodically in recent years. Observers believe the latest measures could further deepen political divisions and trigger renewed debate over civil rights and governance.
With enforcement actions continuing, attention is now focused on possible responses from local leaders, civil society groups and organisations monitoring developments in the region.
