Facebook Twitter Instagram WhatsApp
    Trending
    • Nothing for Goa; Goans treated like 3rd class citizens: Former Cong Chief
    • First Amrit Kaal Budget is for Public Welfare, pro-Poor, says Goa BJP Chief
    • Nothing for Goa in the Union Budget 2023: Goa Forward
    • Goa Police Signs MoU With GEC to enhance R&D, Cyber Security
    • Major Tragedy Averted at Goa Lokotsav as Food Stall Catches Fire
    • Massive fire reported at Taleigao fields; reason of fire unknown
    • Bombay HC at Goa orders GHB to hand over land possession to bidders
    • Theft at Court: North Goa SP says accused well-versed with functioning of the Court
    Login
    Thursday, February 2
    Goemkarponn – Goa NewsGoemkarponn – Goa News
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    ePaper
    • Home
    • Goa News
    • Business
    • Political News
    • Local News
    • Goemkar Special
    • More
      • Top News
      • Sports
      • Page 3
      • Crime
      • Snippets
      • Cricket
      • Football
      • Health
      • Off Beat
    • Video News
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Goemkarponn – Goa NewsGoemkarponn – Goa News
    Home»Goa News

    Will Anti-conversion law withstand LEGAL SCRUTINY?

    adminBy adminMay 30, 2022Updated:August 12, 2022 Goa News No Comments8 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Goemkarponn desk

    PANAJI: The arrest of believer Dominic D’Souza by the Goa Police (Mapusa police) has kicked up a new controversy, with the Chief Minister Dr Pramod Sawant saying that the State will come up with strong anti-conversion law in the forthcoming Assembly.
    Even as an anti-conversion bill awaits the approval of the Goa Legislative Assembly, legal challenges are already being prepared against it.
    Sawant said that few MLAs have suggested bringing in a law to ban religious conversion following the arrest of Dominic D’Souza, a Pastor of 5 Pillars Church at Siolim.
    “Dominic was involved in converting poor and sick people by claiming to have magical powers for the last 30 years. Now because few youths came forward to file a complaint against him, we could arrest him,” he said, adding that the police had thoroughly searched his house, and a lot of incriminating evidence was found in the house.
    If the law is passed, Goa will become the eleventh Indian State to have a law banning religious conversions effected based on misrepresentation, force, fraud, allurement or marriage.
    Since 2017, six states, all led by Bharatiya Janata Party governments, have either passed new anti-conversion laws or updated existing ones. The new versions of the laws put stricter punishments and newer grounds for restricting conversions, such as conversion “by marriage” – where a person who adopts another faith to enter into a marriage would be deemed forcibly converted or luring the poor with money for conversion.
    In addition, two other BJP-ruled states, Harayana and Assam, have announced plans to move similar laws.
    Anti-conversion laws have been challenged in courts ever since Odisha moved the first such legislation in 1967.
    However, the courts have a mixed record defending the freedom of choice with regard to religion, ruling in favour of individual liberty in some cases but not in others.
    The precedent for such cases was established by the Supreme Court in 1977, when a five-judge upheld the constitutionality of India’s first two anti-conversion laws: the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act, 1967 and Madhya Pradesh’s MP Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 1968.
    But the verdict in this case, Stanislaus vs State of Madhya Pradesh, has been criticised by constitutional experts.
    Abhinav Chandrachud, a lawyer and academic, has written that how in upholding these laws, the Supreme Court “went too far”. It could just have held that the right to propagate a religion did not extend to forced conversions, he writes.
    However, the court held that this right does not even include voluntary conversions.
    A senior advocate has said that if a larger bench re-examined Stanislaus, its logic would not stand in the light of the 2017 judgement in the Puttaswamy case recognising the right to privacy as a fundamental right.
    “We now have a nine-judge judgment in the Puttaswamy case, which is concerning privacy,” he said. “I cannot think of anything more private than your relationship with God.” In 2017, the Supreme Court recognised the right to privacy as a fundamental right in the Puttaswamy case.
    Freedom of conscience
    The laws in Odisha and Madhya Pradesh both prohibited conversions from one religion to another if it was made based on force, fraud or any inducement and allurement by way of any gift or gratification or material benefit.
    The petitioners argued that restrictions on conversion contravened their fundamental rights since Article 25(1) of the Constitution grants the right to “freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion”.
    They argued that the word “propagation” should include the right to convert.
    However, the court held that Article 25 does not give the right to convert but only “to transmit or spread one’s religion by an exposition of its tenets”.
    This has become the primary case that justified restrictions on conversion. After this judgment, several states passed their own anti-conversion laws.
    Striking down anti-conversion provisions
    However, one High Court judgment stands out for striking down provisions in an anti-conversion law. In 2012, the Himachal Pradesh High Court
    held that some provisions of the State’s 2006 anti-conversion law were unconstitutional.
    The High Court said that while people have the right to believe and change their beliefs, they also have a right to keep their beliefs secret. Consequently, the court said that the requirement for a person to give notice to the district magistrate 30 days before converting to a different religion would affect her right to privacy.
    “If a person of his own volition changes his religion, there is no way that one can measure or fix the date on which he has ceased to belong to religion A and converted to religion B,” the court said.
    The law also prevented individuals from giving 30 days’ notice if they converted to their “original religion”. The court held this irrational and contrary to the right to equality set out in the Constitution.
    It gave an example to show this. If a person has converted their religion four times, then converting back to their first religion would not require a notice, but converting to their second or third religion would require one.
    The High Court upheld the validity of other provisions of the legislation that prohibited and punished forced conversions.
    The logic in this judgment of how conversions are private affairs and should not have the State’s involvement has only been bolstered after the Supreme Court also recognised privacy as a fundamental right. This might become relevant in future challenges to the anti-conversion legislation.
    Watering down provisions
    In 2021, both the Gujarat and Allahabad High Courts watered down the provisions relating to inter-faith marriages in the anti-conversion laws of their states.
    In August, the Gujarat High Court granted an interim stay to the provisions prohibiting conversion by marriage in amendments to the Freedom of Religion Act, 2003. The court said that this would interfere with the right to the choice of an individual guaranteed under the right to life in Article 21 of the Constitution.
    It also stayed the provision that put the burden of proof on the parties entering into an inter-faith marriage to prove that the marriage had not been solemnised on account of any fraud, allurement or coercion. However, this is only an interim stay that will be in operation only until the court decides on the validity of these laws.
    In November, the Allahabad High Court allowed the registration of the marriages of 17 interfaith couples even though they had not obtained the district authority’s approval for conversion, as required by the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law. The court asked the state authorities and the couples’ families to restrain themselves from “interfering with the life, liberty and privacy” of these individuals.
    The registrar should register the marriage “without insisting/awaiting approval of the competent district authority concerning the conversion of faith”.
    The court said that the approval of conversion from district authority is “directory and not mandatory”.
    It added: “If interpreted otherwise, the Act [the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law] would not satisfy the test of reasonableness and fairness, and would fail to pass the muster of Article 14 and Article 21” the Constitution.
    Another approach
    However, some High Courts have taken a different approach and ruled in favour more checks during conversions and inter-faith marriages. In December 2020, the Uttarakhand High Court asked the district magistrate to conduct an inquiry where a Hindu woman converted to the Muslim faith and married a Muslim man but did not provide adequate notice under the Uttarakhand anti-conversion law. It held that the notice to the district magistrate before conversion for marriage is compulsory.
    At times, the courts have themselves taken up the task of regulating conversions. In 2017, in the absence of a law on the subject, the Rajasthan High Court laid down guidelines on conversions and inter-faith marriages. The court said that anyone who wishes to convert should provide information to the district authorities before conversion and that a marriage can only be solemnised if adequate notice is given to the authorities.
    Pending matters
    The constitutional validity of the anti-conversion laws in at least four states – Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh – has been pending before the Supreme Court since February 2021. A three-judge bench of the court has agreed to test the validity of these laws but has refused to put a stay on them. However, the matter has not been heard since February 2021.
    Meanwhile, petitions have also been filed before several High Courts challenging anti-conversion laws. Any challenge to these laws would require the Supreme Court to relook at its Stanislaus judgment while also taking a right to privacy judgment into account.

    Comment

    admin

    Keep Reading

    HM Rane targets Delhi Mohalla clinics; Says people should follow Goa model

    After Betrayal, Comes The Assurance From Goa CM

    North Goa SP Refutes Hostage Claim of French Actress

    CM in Troubled Mhadei Waters Again as Amit Shah Says Goa Was Part of Decision To Divert Mhadei

    Govt to assit to enhance happiness index: CM

    Govt ready to provide required infra to build the future of students: CM

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Archives
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    Categories
    • Big Story
    • Business News
    • Cricket
    • Crime
    • Football
    • Goa News
    • Goemkar Special
    • Health
    • India News
    • Local News
    • Off Beat
    • Opinion
    • Page 3
    • Photos
    • Political News
    • Snippets
    • Sports
    • Top News
    • Trending
    About
    About

    The Goemkarponn digital media platform gives you the latest news of the Goa Region. To read Goemkarponn News on your mobile, download our Android App (Goemkarponn News App).

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
    LINKS
    • Local News
    • Goa News
    • Political News
    • Goemkar Special
    ADVERTISEMENT
    AVAILABLE AD BANNER
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Goemkarponn © 2023 - Powered by Xperts!.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Do not sell my personal information.
    Cookie SettingsAccept
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below.

    Lost password?